Branding for Startups
Learn to build a minimum viable brand system for an early-stage startup on a real budget and timeline: a positioning and one-page brand brief, a name checked for trademark and a .com domain, a logo built from a defined type and colour direction, a small but scalable identity (palette, type, simple components), and a tight deck that presents the strategy to founders and gets a decision. You will work the way a lean studio or solo designer actually does, choosing where to spend the few hundred dollars that matter and where to use free tools.
For founders, freelance and in-house designers, and early marketers who need to create a credible startup brand quickly and on a small budget, without a six-month agency engagement.
Course content
Workbook & downloads
Put the course into practice — a printable workbook plus editable templates you can fill in and reuse.
Preview the workbook
Strategy Before Visuals
- Company / working name
- Positioning statement (we are the [category] for [audience] who [need], unlike [alternative], because [reason])
- Primary audience (role, context, before-state, after-state)
- Personality (3 to 5 we are / we are not pairs)
- Competitive frame (3 to 5 rivals and how we differ)
- Brand promise and proof (the one guarantee and the evidence)
- Constraints (budget, deadline, must-keep assets, first surface)
- Complete Geoffrey Moore's template: For [target] who [need], our [product] is a [category] that [benefit], unlike [competitor].
- Now write the same idea as Marty Neumeier's one-liner: we are the only [category] that [unique benefit].
- Run the so-what test: does a stranger understand what you do and who it is for in one read? Cut any word that fails.
- Check the personality adjectives: cross out any (friendly, innovative, trustworthy) that three competitors could also claim, and replace them.
- Competitor name
- Logo type (wordmark / lettermark / symbol / combination)
- Primary colour (and is there a category default?)
- Typeface feel (geometric / humanist / serif; modern or classic)
- Imagery style (photo / illustration / 3D / abstract)
- Voice (one-line read: corporate / witty / plain / technical)
- Map axis 1 (e.g. playful — serious)
- Map axis 2 (e.g. budget — premium)
- Empty quadrant / territory we will own
- I have a one-page brief signed off by all founders before any design
- The positioning passes the so-what test in a single read
- Personality is captured as we are / we are not pairs a rival would not claim
- I have audited five to ten competitors for logo, colour, type, imagery and voice
- I have plotted competitors on a two-axis map and identified the empty quadrant
- The territory the brand will own is written into the competitive-frame line of the brief
Naming and the Verbal Brand
- Set a timer and produce 50 to 100 candidates across the types: descriptive, suggestive, invented, real-word-out-of-context, compound, and founder or place.
- Pull roots from the brief: the core benefit, the audience, the feeling, relevant metaphors, and word fragments.
- Use a thesaurus, Latin or Greek roots, and an AI tool (Namelix or Squadhelp) to push past your first ten ideas.
- Only after the list is long, shortlist the names that feel sayable, spellable, short and distinct, and carry them forward.
- Candidate name
- Trademark conflict in our class? (USPTO TESS / EUIPO / web search) — notes
- .com available? (registrar) and viable alternative (brand-plus-word .com, .io, .ai, .co)
- Social handles available? (Namechk / Namecheckr) — which platforms
- App Store / Google Play clear? (if an app is planned)
- Slang / language check clear in target markets?
- Overall verdict (keep / drop) — leave blank until all checks done
- One-line value proposition (homepage hero, plain words)
- Tagline (optional: benefit or attitude)
- Voice trait 1 (we are / we are not)
- Voice trait 2 (we are / we are not)
- Voice trait 3 (we are / we are not)
- Before / after rewrite 1 (jargon sentence then on-brand sentence)
- Before / after rewrite 2
- Preferred terms, words to avoid, and house style (case, Oxford comma, numerals)
- I generated a long list across name types before judging any of them
- My shortlist names are sayable, spellable, short and distinct from competitors
- I checked the top names against USPTO TESS (or my region) and the open web for conflicts in my class
- I checked .com and viable alternatives, social handles, and app stores where relevant
- I ran a slang and language check for embarrassing meanings in target markets
- I have a one-line value proposition and a one-page voice kit with before-and-after rewrites
- I will recommend a trademark attorney confirm the final pick before filing or launch
The Minimum Viable Visual Identity
- Primary typeface and source (favour free Google Fonts for an MVP)
- Secondary / body typeface (if any)
- Why this type fits the brief's personality and the open quadrant
- Primary brand colour — name, HEX, RGB
- Accent colour(s) — name, HEX, RGB
- Neutral range (greys, black, white) — HEX values
- 60-30-10 split (which colour is dominant / secondary / accent)
- Contrast check result (body text and large text pass AA? tool used)
- Set the company name in the chosen typeface and refine spacing, weight, and any custom letterforms.
- Decide whether a simple, reducible symbol earns its place beside the wordmark, and test it at 16px favicon size.
- Check the mark on a dark background and as an app icon before committing to it.
- Produce the core lockups (primary, horizontal, stacked, mono black, mono white, reversed, symbol) and export each as SVG and PNG.
- Logo files collected (all lockups SVG + PNG, favicon, app icon)
- Colour tokens written as named, copyable HEX values
- Type scale recorded (level, size, weight, line height)
- Core components built (primary + secondary button, card, form fields with states)
- Spacing scale and grid set (e.g. 4 or 8px grid)
- Social templates + one slide master created
- Icon library chosen and named (Phosphor / Feather / Lucide)
- Home of the kit (Figma file link; Canva Brand Kit if used)
- Type and colour direction are locked before the logo, and match the brief and the open quadrant
- Every text-on-colour pairing passes WCAG AA (4.5 to 1 body, 3 to 1 large) or is restricted
- The logo is simple and tested at favicon size, app-icon size, and on a dark background
- The core lockups exist and are exported as SVG and PNG, not screenshots
- A clear-space rule and a minimum size are defined for the logo
- The MVP kit has buttons, a card, form fields, a spacing scale, templates and a named icon set
- A non-designer could make a correct slide and social post from the kit without asking me
Pricing, Presenting and Handover
- Founder budget and deadline
- Tier chosen (Starter / Standard / Growth) and why
- Deliverables included (list every item and file format)
- Where the budget is concentrated (strategy / name / type and colour)
- Where you economise (early applications and polish)
- Concept directions offered (e.g. 2 to 3) and revision rounds (e.g. 2)
- Out of scope (named explicitly)
- Milestones and payment schedule (deposit / midpoint / final)
- Draft slides in order: brief recap, competitive map, type and colour direction, logo in context, system applications, recommendation.
- Mock the logo into real contexts at real sizes (phone, sign, card, dark background, favicon) rather than a bare mark on white.
- Write the one-line justification from the brief for each major choice (because the brief said X).
- Decide the single decision you will ask for at the end, and frame the feedback question as does this fit who we agreed we are, not do you like it.
- Asset folder structure and file formats (logos, favicon, fonts/licences, swatches)
- Living guide platform (Figma / Notion) and what it covers
- One-page brand-at-a-glance produced? (Y/N)
- Editable source files handed over? (Figma kit, templates)
- Walkthrough done? (call or recorded Loom)
- Triggers for investing more (a round, a pivot, a marketing hire, a new market)
- Contact and recommended cheap next steps
- The scope fixes the deliverables, concept directions and revision rounds in writing
- The budget is concentrated on strategy, name, and type and colour, not early polish
- The presentation opens with strategy so the logo arrives as an answer, not a surprise
- The logo is shown in real contexts at real sizes, and each choice is justified from the brief
- I bring one recommended direction and at most one alternative, and ask for a clear decision
- Handover includes organised assets, a light living guide, a one-page summary and source files
- I have explained the brand will grow, named the triggers to invest, and stressed consistency over tweaking
Your Action Plan
- Run a founder kickoff and write a one-page brand brief, then get explicit sign-off before designing
- Audit five to ten competitors, plot them on a two-axis map, and claim the empty visual territory
- Generate 50 to 100 name candidates across types, then shortlist the sayable, spellable, distinct ones
- Run the shortlist through the trademark, domain, handle and language gauntlet and rank the survivors
- Write a one-line value proposition and a one-page voice kit with before-and-after rewrites
- Set a type and colour direction from the brief and test every text pairing for WCAG AA contrast
- Design a simple, scalable logo and export the core lockups as SVG and PNG with clear-space rules
- Assemble an MVP brand kit (tokens, buttons, card, templates, icon set) in Figma plus a one-page summary
- Scope and price the work in honest tiers with fixed concept directions and revision rounds
- Present strategy-first to founders for a decision, then hand over an organised, runnable system and a growth plan
Pairs well with
Courses members commonly take alongside this one.